From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de,
dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, nikita@clusterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com,
richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/23] lib: percpu_counter_sum_positive
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:45:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816074626.229992000@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070816074525.065850000@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: percpu_counter_sum_positive.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4855 bytes --]
Because its consitent with percpu_counter_read*
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
fs/ext3/super.c | 4 ++--
fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
fs/file_table.c | 2 +-
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 4 ++--
lib/percpu_counter.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext3/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -2472,13 +2472,13 @@ static int ext3_statfs (struct dentry *
buf->f_type = EXT3_SUPER_MAGIC;
buf->f_bsize = sb->s_blocksize;
buf->f_blocks = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - sbi->s_overhead_last;
- buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+ buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
es->s_free_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32(buf->f_bfree);
buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count);
if (buf->f_bfree < le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count))
buf->f_bavail = 0;
buf->f_files = le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count);
- buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
+ buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(buf->f_ffree);
buf->f_namelen = EXT3_NAME_LEN;
fsid = le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid) ^
Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext4/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2592,13 +2592,13 @@ static int ext4_statfs (struct dentry *
buf->f_type = EXT4_SUPER_MAGIC;
buf->f_bsize = sb->s_blocksize;
buf->f_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(es) - sbi->s_overhead_last;
- buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+ buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
es->s_free_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32(buf->f_bfree);
buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - ext4_r_blocks_count(es);
if (buf->f_bfree < ext4_r_blocks_count(es))
buf->f_bavail = 0;
buf->f_files = le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count);
- buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
+ buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(buf->f_ffree);
buf->f_namelen = EXT4_NAME_LEN;
fsid = le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid) ^
Index: linux-2.6/fs/file_table.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/file_table.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/file_table.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct file *get_empty_filp(void)
* percpu_counters are inaccurate. Do an expensive check before
* we go and fail.
*/
- if (percpu_counter_sum(&nr_files) >= files_stat.max_files)
+ if (percpu_counter_sum_positive(&nr_files) >= files_stat.max_files)
goto over;
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_c
void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
-s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
+s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static inline s64 percpu_counter_read_po
return fbc->count;
}
-static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
return percpu_counter_read_positive(fbc);
}
Index: linux-2.6/lib/percpu_counter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ linux-2.6/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
* Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
* but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
*/
-s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
s64 ret;
int cpu;
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_cou
spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sum);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sum_positive);
void percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 7:45 [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9 Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 01/23] nfs: remove congestion_end() Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 02/23] lib: percpu_counter_add Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 15:48 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 03/23] lib: percpu_counter_sub Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 04/23] lib: percpu_counter variable batch Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 05/23] lib: make percpu_counter_add take s64 Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 06/23] lib: percpu_counter_set Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 08/23] lib: percpu_count_sum() Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 09/23] lib: percpu_counter_init error handling Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 15:56 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-17 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-18 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-23 18:24 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 10/23] lib: percpu_counter_init_irq Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 11/23] mm: bdi init hooks Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 16:10 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-17 16:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 12/23] containers: " Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 13/23] mtd: " Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 14/23] mtd: clean up the backing_dev_info usage Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 15/23] mtd: give mtdconcat devices their own backing_dev_info Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 16/23] mm: scalable bdi statistics counters Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 16:20 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-17 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 17/23] mm: count reclaimable pages per BDI Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 16:23 ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 18/23] mm: count writeback " Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 19/23] mm: expose BDI statistics in sysfs Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 20/23] lib: floating proportions Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 21/23] mm: per device dirty threshold Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 22/23] mm: dirty balancing for tasks Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 7:45 ` [PATCH 23/23] debug: sysfs files for the current ratio/size/total Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-16 21:29 ` [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9 Christoph Lameter
2007-08-17 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-17 20:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-11 19:53 [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v10 Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-11 19:53 ` [PATCH 07/23] lib: percpu_counter_sum_positive Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070816074626.229992000@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
--cc=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=yingchao.zhou@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox