From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>,
Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones pointer
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:42:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070813234217.GI3406@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708131518320.28626@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > x86_64 is the only platforms that uses ZONE_DMA32. Ia64 and other 64 bit
> > > platforms use ZONE_DMA for <4GB allocs.
> >
> > Yes, but ZONE_DMA32 == ZONE_DMA.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by that. Ia64 ZONE_DMA == x86_84 ZONE_DMA32?
Hmm, when I wrote GFP_DMA32 it was a #define GFP_DMA32 GFP_DMA
on ia64 so that drivers not need to ifdef. Someone nasty
seems to have removed that too. I guess it would be best
to readd.
>
> > Also when the slab users of GFP_DMA are all gone ia64 won't need
> > the slab support anymore. So either you change your ifdef in slub or
> > switch to ZONE_DMA32 for IA64.
>
> If you have gotten rid of all slab users of GFP_DMA (and also all arch
> uses of it) then we can drop the code in SLAB.
No, e.g. s390 and some other architectures still use it.
You'll need to bug their respective maintainers.
> 1. Drop sl?b support for GFP_DMA.
Not yet.
>
> 2. Drop GFP_DMA32 support.
>
> Then we only allow page allocator allocs using GFP_DMA? That may be the
Kind of yes.
> least invasive for arch code.
I would prefer for GFP_DMA to go away on x86 (but GFP_DMA32 stay). This way
we get clean compile errors instead of subtle breakage. Silently
changing the semantics would be bad.
But then it wouldn't make sense to have GFP_DMA on ia64 and GFP_DMA32
on x86. Since driver writers are more likely to test on x86
I would recommend ia64 having compatible semantics. It'll
save everybody trouble long term. This means it wouldn't
help on IA64 machines that don't have a DMA zone -- they
would still need to validate drivers especially -- but at least
the others.
Also from my driver review driver authors often seem to have
trouble understanding what GFP_DMA really does. With GFP_DMA32 it
is clearer that it applies to a address range and is not
some synonym for pci_map_*
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-09 21:06 [PATCH 0/4] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v3 Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use one zonelist that is filtered instead of multiple zonelists Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones pointer Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 23:33 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-10 1:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-10 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-10 17:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-10 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-11 1:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 21:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 22:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 22:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:42 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-13 22:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 0:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 0:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 0:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14 0:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-14 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-14 0:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:44 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-14 19:11 ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-14 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-14 19:43 ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-14 21:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 11:37 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-08-15 12:59 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 12:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-08-15 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] Apply MPOL_BIND policy to two highest zones when highest is ZONE_MOVABLE Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v3 Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070813234217.GI3406@bingen.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox