linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones pointer
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:42:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070813234217.GI3406@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708131518320.28626@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > x86_64 is the only platforms that uses ZONE_DMA32. Ia64 and other 64 bit 
> > > platforms use ZONE_DMA for <4GB allocs.
> > 
> > Yes, but ZONE_DMA32 == ZONE_DMA.
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by that. Ia64 ZONE_DMA == x86_84 ZONE_DMA32?

Hmm, when I wrote GFP_DMA32 it was a #define GFP_DMA32 GFP_DMA 
on ia64 so that drivers not need to ifdef.  Someone nasty
seems to have removed that too. I guess it would be best
to readd.

> 
> > Also when the slab users of GFP_DMA are all gone ia64 won't need
> > the slab support anymore. So either you change your ifdef in slub or 
> > switch to ZONE_DMA32 for IA64.
> 
> If you have gotten rid of all slab users of GFP_DMA (and also all arch 
> uses of it) then we can drop the code in SLAB.

No, e.g. s390 and some other architectures still use it.
You'll need to bug their respective maintainers.


> 1. Drop sl?b support for GFP_DMA.

Not yet.

> 
> 2. Drop GFP_DMA32 support.
> 
> Then we only allow page allocator allocs using GFP_DMA? That may be the 

Kind of yes.

> least invasive for arch code.

I would prefer for GFP_DMA to go away on x86 (but GFP_DMA32 stay). This way
we get clean compile errors instead of subtle breakage. Silently
changing the semantics would be bad.

But then it wouldn't make sense to have GFP_DMA on ia64 and GFP_DMA32
on x86. Since driver writers are more likely to test on x86
I would recommend ia64 having compatible semantics. It'll
save everybody trouble long term. This means it wouldn't 
help on IA64 machines that don't have a DMA zone -- they
would still need to validate drivers especially -- but at least
the others.

Also from my driver review driver authors often seem to have
trouble understanding what GFP_DMA really does. With GFP_DMA32 it 
is clearer that it applies to a address range and is not
some synonym for pci_map_*

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-13 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-09 21:06 [PATCH 0/4] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v3 Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:19   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] Use one zonelist that is filtered instead of multiple zonelists Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones pointer Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:37   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 23:33     ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-10  1:44       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-10 10:47         ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-10 17:37           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-10 18:13             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 19:02               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-11  1:04                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 21:25                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 22:50                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:00                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 22:58                         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:09                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:08                             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:22                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:42                                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-13 22:52                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:55                                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:12                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14  0:16                                         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:25                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14  0:25                                             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:38                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:43                                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 22:54                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14  0:00                                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:16                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14  0:16                                         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:27                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-14  0:26                                             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-14 19:56                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-13 23:22                                       ` Alan Cox
2007-08-14  0:14                                         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 23:44                                           ` Alan Cox
2007-08-14 19:11                                           ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-14 20:23                                             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-14 19:43                                               ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-14 21:05                                                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 11:37                                           ` Ralf Baechle
2007-08-15 12:59                                             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-15 12:32                                               ` Ralf Baechle
2007-08-15 19:59                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] Apply MPOL_BIND policy to two highest zones when highest is ZONE_MOVABLE Mel Gorman
2007-08-09 21:37   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-09 21:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v3 Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070813234217.GI3406@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@skynet.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox