From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:47:26 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v2 Message-ID: <20070809144726.GA22405@skynet.ie> References: <20070808161504.32320.79576.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <1186597819.5055.37.camel@localhost> <20070808214420.GD2441@skynet.ie> <1186612807.5055.106.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1186612807.5055.106.camel@localhost> From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Christoph Lameter , pj@sgi.com, ak@suse.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On (08/08/07 18:40), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce: > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 22:44 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > With the patch currently, a a nodemask is passed in for > > filtering which should be enough as the zonelist being used should be enough > > information to indicate the starting node. > > It'll take me a while to absorb the patch, so I'll just ask: Where does > the zonelist for the argument come from? If the the bind policy > zonelist is removed, then does it come from a node? Yes, it gets the zonelist from the node and uses a nodemask to ignore zones within it. > There'll be only > one per node with your other patches, right? So you had to have a node > id, to look up the zonelist? You have the local node_id to lookup the zonelist with. The policy provides a nodemask then instead of a zonelist for filtering purposes. > Do you need the zonelist elsewhere, > outside of alloc_pages()? If not, why not just let alloc_pages look it > up from a starting node [which I think can be determined from the > policy]? > The starting node can be determined from where we are currently running on. Even if the local node is not in the nodemask, we'd still filter it as normal. > OK, that's a lot of questions. no need to answer. That's just what I'm > thinking re: all this. I'll wait and see how the patch develops. > > > > > The signature of __alloc_pages() becomes > > > > static page * fastcall > > __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, > > unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist) > > > > > For various policies, the arguments would look like this: > > > Policy start node nodemask > > > > > > default local node cpuset_current_mems_allowed > > > > > > preferred preferred_node cpuset_current_mems_allowed > > > > > > interleave computed node cpuset_current_mems_allowed > > > > > > bind local node policy nodemask [replaces bind > > > zonelist in mempolicy] > > > > > > > The last one is the most interesting. Much of the patch in development > > involves deleting the custom node stuff. I've included the patch below if > > you're curious. I wanted to get one-zonelist out first to see if we could > > agree on that before going further with it. > > Again, it'll be a while. > Thanks anyway. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org