From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:35:02 +0100 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 Message-ID: <20070807203502.66b9ebda@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <46B8C016.6090806@tmr.com> References: <20070803123712.987126000@chello.nl> <20070804063217.GA25069@elte.hu> <20070804070737.GA940@elte.hu> <20070804103347.GA1956@elte.hu> <20070804163733.GA31001@elte.hu> <46B4C0A8.1000902@garzik.org> <20070804191205.GA24723@lazybastard.org> <20070804192130.GA25346@elte.hu> <20070804211156.5f600d80@the-village.bc.nu> <46B4E161.9080100@garzik.org> <46B8C016.6090806@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > However, relatime has the POSIX behavior without the overhead. Therefore No. relatime has approximately SuS behaviour. Its not the same as "correct" behaviour. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org