From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:05:21 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 Message-ID: <20070807070521.GC19745@elte.hu> References: <46B4C0A8.1000902@garzik.org> <20070804191205.GA24723@lazybastard.org> <20070804192130.GA25346@elte.hu> <20070804192615.GA25600@lazybastard.org> <20070804194259.GA25753@lazybastard.org> <20070805203602.GB25107@infradead.org> <46B7626C.6050403@redhat.com> <20070806203710.39bdc42e@the-village.bc.nu> <46B77AB3.40006@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B77AB3.40006@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Chuck Ebbert Cc: Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , J??rn Engel , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com, richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, david@lang.hm List-ID: * Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > Ingo's latest 'not quite noatime' seems to cure mutt/tmpwatch so it > > might finally make sense to do so. > > Do we report max(ctime, mtime) as the atime by default when noatime is > set or do we still need that to be done? noatime is unchanged by my patch (it is not the same as the 'improved relatime' mode my patch activates), but it would make sense to do your change, independently. Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org