From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:31:04 -0700 References: <20070806102922.907530000@chello.nl> <200708061035.18742.phillips@phunq.net> <1186424248.11797.66.camel@lappy> In-Reply-To: <1186424248.11797.66.camel@lappy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708061231.04982.phillips@phunq.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Miller , Andrew Morton , Daniel Phillips , Pekka Enberg , Christoph Lameter , Matt Mackall , Lee Schermerhorn , Steve Dickson List-ID: On Monday 06 August 2007 11:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > And how do we know a page was taken out of the reserves? Why not return that in the low bit of the page address? This is a little more cache efficient, does not leave that odd footprint in the page union and forces the caller to examine the alloc_pages(...P_MEMALLOC) return, making it harder to overlook the fact that it got a page out of reserve and forget to put one back later. Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org