From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:36:23 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: NUMA policy issues with ZONE_MOVABLE Message-Id: <20070802093623.05dfd39e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1185994779.5059.87.camel@localhost> References: <20070725111646.GA9098@skynet.ie> <20070726132336.GA18825@skynet.ie> <20070726225920.GA10225@skynet.ie> <1185994779.5059.87.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Mel Gorman , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pj@sgi.com List-ID: On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:59:39 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > Kame-san's patch to just exclude the DMA zones from the zonelists is looking > better--better than changing zonelist order when zone_movable is populated! > I'm now considering setting "lowmem_reserve_ratio" to appropriate value can help node-order case. (Many cutomer uses the default (in RHEL4 = 0) and saw troubles.). Is it not enough ? Thanks, -Kame. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org