From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l71G9of3022981 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:09:50 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l71G9oo5368642 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:09:50 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l71G9ohv001305 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:09:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:09:49 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Message-ID: <20070801160949.GH31324@us.ibm.com> References: <20070727194316.18614.36380.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070727194322.18614.68855.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070731192241.380e93a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070731200522.c19b3b95.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070801155803.GG31324@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070801155803.GG31324@us.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, pj@sgi.com, kxr@sgi.com, Mel Gorman , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On 01.08.2007 [08:58:03 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 31.07.2007 [20:14:08 -0700], Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > ooookay... I don't think I want to be the first person who gets > > > to do that, so I shall duck them for -mm2. > > > > > > I think there were updates pending anyway. I saw several under-replied-to > > > patches from Lee but it wasn't clear it they were relevant to these changes > > > or what. > > > > I have not seen those. We also have the issue with slab allocations > > failing on NUMAQ with its HIGHMEM zones. > > > > Andi wants to drop support for NUMAQ again. Is that possible? NUMA only on > > 64 bit? > > > > I have checked the current patchset and the fix into a git archive. > > Those interested in working on this can do a > > > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/christoph/numa.git memoryless_nodes > > > > to get the current patchset (This is a bit rough. Sorry Lee the attribution is screwed > > up but we will fix this once I get the hang of it). > > Are you sure this is uptodate? Acc'g to gitweb, the last commit was July > 22... And I don't see a 'memoryless_nodes' ref in `git peek-remote`. Bah, sorry, I copied the slab.git that was typo'd elsewhere in this thread. Indeed, numa.git has the right stuff. Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org