linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	pj@sgi.com, kxr@sgi.com, Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:19:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708011119.33242.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070731203203.2691ca59.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wednesday 01 August 2007 05:32:03 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > ooookay...   I don't think I want to be the first person who gets
> > > to do that, so I shall duck them for -mm2.
> > > 
> > > I think there were updates pending anyway.   I saw several under-replied-to
> > > patches from Lee but it wasn't clear it they were relevant to these changes
> > > or what.
> > 
> > I have not seen those. We also have the issue with slab allocations 
> > failing on NUMAQ with its HIGHMEM zones. 
> > 
> > Andi wants to drop support for NUMAQ again. Is that possible? NUMA only on 
> > 64 bit?
> 
> umm, that would need wide circulation.  I have a feeling that some
> implementations of some of the more obscure 32-bit architectures can (or
> will) have numa characteristics.  Looks like mips might already.

The problem here is really highmem and NUMA. If they only have lowmem
i guess it would be reasonably easy to support.

> And doesn't i386 summit do numa?

Yes, it does. But I don't think many are run in NUMA mode.


-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-01  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-27 19:43 [PATCH 00/14] NUMA: Memoryless node support V4 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 01/14] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-30 21:38   ` [PATCH/RFC] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for preferred_node < 0 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-30 22:00     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 15:32       ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-31 15:58         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 21:05     ` [PATCH/RFC] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for preferred_node < 0 - v2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-01  2:22   ` [PATCH 01/14] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Andrew Morton
2007-08-01  2:52     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01  3:05       ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-01  3:14         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01  3:32           ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-01  3:37             ` Christoph Lameter
     [not found]             ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707312151400.2894@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
2007-08-01  5:07               ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-01  5:11                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-01  5:22                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01 10:24                   ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 16:23                   ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 20:00                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01  5:36             ` Paul Mundt
2007-08-01  9:19             ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-01 14:03             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-01 17:41               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01 17:54                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 20:05                 ` [PATCH/RFC/WIP] cpuset-independent interleave policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 20:34                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 21:04                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-03  0:31                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 20:19                 ` Audit of "all uses of node_online()" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 20:26                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-08 22:19                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-08 23:40                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-16 14:17                         ` [PATCH/RFC] memoryless nodes - fixup uses of node_online_map in generic code Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-16 18:33                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-16 19:15                             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-16 21:10                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-16 21:13                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-24 16:09                         ` [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - Move setup of N_CPU node state mask Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-06 13:56                           ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 20:33                   ` Audit of "all uses of node_online()" Andrew Morton
2007-08-02 20:45                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-01 15:58           ` [PATCH 01/14] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-01 16:09             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-01 17:47             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-01 15:25         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 02/14] Memoryless nodes: introduce mask of nodes with memory Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 03/14] Memoryless Nodes: Fix interleave behavior Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 04/14] OOM: use the N_MEMORY map instead of constructing one on the fly Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 05/14] Memoryless Nodes: No need for kswapd Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:43 ` [PATCH 06/14] Memoryless Node: Slab support Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 07/14] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 08/14] Uncached allocator: Handle memoryless nodes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 09/14] Memoryless node: Allow profiling data to fall back to other nodes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] Memoryless nodes: Update memory policy and page migration Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] Add N_CPU node state Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] Memoryless nodes: Fix GFP_THISNODE behavior Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] Memoryless Nodes: use "node_memory_map" for cpusets Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:44 ` [PATCH 14/14] Memoryless nodes: drop one memoryless node boot warning Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 20:59 ` [PATCH 00/14] NUMA: Memoryless node support V4 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-30 13:48   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-29 12:35 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-30 16:07   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-30 18:56     ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-30 21:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-30 22:06   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-30 22:35     ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-30 22:36       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31 23:18         ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708011119.33242.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kxr@sgi.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@skynet.ie \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox