From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:19:12 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Allow selected nodes to be excluded from MPOL_INTERLEAVE masks Message-Id: <20070728151912.c541aec0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1185566878.5069.123.camel@localhost> References: <1185566878.5069.123.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-mm , Paul Mundt , Christoph Lameter , Nishanth Aravamudan , kxr@sgi.com, ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Eric Whitney List-ID: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:07:57 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > Questions: > > * do we need/want a sysctl for run time modifications? IMO, no. > I can agree that runtime modification is not necessary. But applications or libnuma will not use this information ? Doing all in implicit way is enough ? (maybe enough) BTW, could you print "nodes of XXXX are ignored in INTERLEAVE mempolicy" to /var/log/messages at boot ? -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org