From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] remove ZERO_PAGE?
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:54:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070727055406.GA22581@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707262226420.3442@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:29:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to see if we can get the ball rolling on this again, and try to
> > get it in 2.6.24 maybe. Any comments?
>
> I'd really want real performance numbers. I don't like the "remove it
> because I don't like it". I want real numbers for real loads before I'm
> really interested.
What numbers, though? I can make up benchmarks to show that ZERO_PAGE
sucks just as much. The problem I don't think is finding a situatoin that
improves without it (we have an extreme case where the Altix livelocked)
but to get confidence that nothing is going to blow up.
> Last time this came up, the logic behind wanting to remove the zero page
> was all screwed up, and it was all based on totally broken premises. So I
> really want somethign else than just "I don't like it".
I thought that last time this came up you thought it might be good to
try out in -mm initially.
> Sorry. In the absense of numbers (and not just some made-up branchmark:
> something real - I can _easily_ make benchmarks that show that ZERO_PAGE
> is wonderful), I'm not at all interested.
OK, well what numbers would you like to see? I can always try a few
things.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-27 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-27 2:19 Nick Piggin
2007-07-27 5:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-27 5:54 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-07-27 15:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-30 3:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-30 3:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-30 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-30 4:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-30 4:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-27 15:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-30 13:52 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-07-30 18:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-30 22:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-07-30 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-31 0:03 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-08-01 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-08-01 1:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-01 2:19 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-08-01 3:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-02 4:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-03 1:40 ` Neil Brown
2007-08-01 2:17 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070727055406.GA22581@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox