From: Bongani Hlope <bhlope@mweb.co.za>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Deaton <false.hopes@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: updatedb
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:39:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707260839.51407.bhlope@mweb.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A81C39.4050009@gmail.com>
On Thursday 26 July 2007 05:59:53 Rene Herman wrote:
>
> Problem spot no. 1.
>
> RAM intensive? If I run updatedb here, it never grows itself beyond 2M.
> Yes, two. I'm certainly willing to accept that me and my systems are
> possibly not the reference but assuming I'm _very_ special hasn't done much
> for me either in the past.
>
> The thing updatedb does do, or at least has the potential to do, is fill
> memory with cached inodes/dentries but Linux does not swap to make room for
> caches. So why will updatedb "often cause things to be swapped out"?
>
> [ snip ]
>
> > Swap prefetch, on the other hand, would have kicked in shortly after
> > updatedb finished, leaving the applications in swap for a speedy
> > recovery when the person comes back to their computer.
>
> Problem spot no. 2.
>
> If updatedb filled all of RAM with inodes/dentries, that RAM is now used
> (ie, not free) and swap-prefetch wouldn't have anywhere to prefetch into so
> would _not_ have kicked in.
>
> So what's happening? If you sit down with a copy op "top" in one terminal
> and updatedb in another, what does it show?
>
> Rene.
Just tested that, there's a steady increase in the useage of buff
<start updatedb>
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
2 1 0 1279412 201160 234720 0 0 193 29 558 657 5 1 89 5
0 1 0 1276624 203436 234872 0 0 2276 0 1638 2456 4 2 48 48
1 1 0 1273372 206292 235012 0 0 2852 0 1773 2755 3 3 48 46
2 1 0 1270128 208376 235360 0 0 2084 0 1545 2168 5 2 47 46
8<
0 1 0 1228004 237288 237836 0 0 2192 0 1669 2941 6 3 47 44
1 1 0 1223424 239228 238020 0 0 1932 272 1580 2881 9 4 44 44
1 1 0 1219692 241600 238208 0 0 2372 0 1719 2881 10 4 45 43
0 1 0 1217296 243372 238312 0 0 1772 0 1526 2320 4 2 49 46
8<
0 1 0 1166852 277912 240840 0 0 2244 0 1699 3037 7 2 48 43
0 1 0 1164016 279528 241016 0 0 1608 824 1512 2364 7 2 47 44
1 1 0 1161256 281860 241264 0 0 2332 0 1709 2769 7 2 49 43
1 1 0 1155632 284792 241452 0 0 2932 0 1835 3084 8 4 46 42
8<
0 1 0 1104568 324788 243616 0 0 3500 4 1879 3054 5 4 46 46
1 1 0 1099596 328524 243768 0 0 3736 0 1990 3257 7 4 48 43
1 1 0 1093976 332516 244060 0 0 3984 572 2013 3348 6 3 48 43
0 1 0 1090320 335396 244340 0 0 2880 0 1760 2925 5 3 47 46
8<
1 1 0 1025212 384380 248224 0 0 2940 0 1763 2864 6 3 46 46
0 1 0 1022196 386444 248328 0 0 2064 8 1527 2543 5 2 45 47
0 1 0 1018620 389476 248404 0 0 3032 0 1798 2988 6 3 47 45
0 1 0 1014800 392364 248552 0 0 2888 0 1738 2821 5 2 48 45
8<
0 1 0 425200 839828 273392 0 0 1744 0 1441 2248 9 2 44 46
0 1 0 423360 841220 273544 0 0 1384 368 1374 2144 3 1 48 48
0 1 0 421288 842868 273576 0 0 1648 0 1400 2141 4 2 46 48
0 1 0 418252 845172 273676 0 0 2300 0 1570 2492 3 1 49 48
0 0 0 417300 846100 273776 0 0 928 0 1232 1837 3 2 72 24
<updatedb finished>
0 0 0 416724 846100 273776 0 0 0 0 1025 1579 5 1 94 0
0 0 0 417012 846100 273776 0 0 0 0 1002 1474 3 1 97 0
1 0 0 417220 846100 273776 0 0 0 0 1026 1414 2 0 98 0
So 32 percent of free memory went to the buffers.
5 minutes later it's still not freed
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
2 0 0 409500 846652 277320 0 0 286 31 585 766 6 1 83 10
1 0 0 409328 846652 277320 0 0 0 0 1003 1442 3 1 97 0
/proc/slabinfo
ext3_inode_cache 176198 176200 816 5 1 : tunables 54 27 8 :
slabdata 35240 35240 0
dentry 233054 233054 208 19 1 : tunables 120 60 8 :
slabdata 12266 12266 0
buffer_head 228303 228327 104 37 1 : tunables 120 60 8 :
slabdata 6171 6171 0
run OpenOffice
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
1 0 0 403664 847056 277460 0 0 235 26 577 766 6 1 85 8
0 0 0 403656 847056 277460 0 0 0 0 1003 1385 5 0 96 0
0 0 0 403888 847056 277460 0 0 0 0 1237 1968 3 1 96 0
8<
<starts openoffice>
0 0 0 400708 847088 277620 0 0 0 0 1058 1259 4 0 95 0
0 0 0 400584 847088 277620 0 0 0 0 1246 1647 7 1 93 0
1 1 0 389796 847164 284100 0 0 6528 116 1215 2663 10 4 71 14
8<
0 0 0 307000 847464 361384 0 0 0 0 1031 1398 5 1 95 0
0 0 0 307000 847464 361384 0 0 0 0 1003 1369 3 1 95 0
0 0 0 307124 847464 361384 0 0 0 0 1025 1535 4 1 95 0
8<
1 1 0 301920 847516 363176 0 0 1780 132 1092 1705 11 2 77 10
1 1 0 289296 847588 367620 0 0 4608 152 1221 2280 31 4 48 18
1 0 0 285672 847612 369572 0 0 1936 0 1061 3545 14 3 72 10
<open office loaded>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-26 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-25 15:30 howto get a patch merged (WAS: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) Kacper Wysocki
2007-07-25 16:01 ` Rene Herman
2007-07-25 17:15 ` Robert Deaton
2007-07-26 3:59 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-26 6:23 ` updatedb Andika Triwidada
2007-07-26 7:49 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-26 9:37 ` updatedb Andika Triwidada
2007-07-27 0:46 ` updatedb Jesper Juhl
2007-07-27 6:00 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-27 7:54 ` updatedb Mike Galbraith
2007-07-27 8:28 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-27 9:26 ` updatedb Mike Galbraith
2007-07-27 11:09 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-27 11:48 ` updatedb Mike Galbraith
2007-07-27 12:28 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-27 13:32 ` updatedb Tilman Schmidt
2007-07-26 6:39 ` Bongani Hlope [this message]
2007-07-26 6:56 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-26 7:08 ` updatedb Bongani Hlope
2007-07-26 8:01 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-26 21:25 ` updatedb Bongani Hlope
2007-07-26 9:58 ` updatedb Björn Steinbrink
2007-07-26 10:23 ` updatedb Björn Steinbrink
2007-07-26 11:00 ` updatedb Rene Herman
2007-07-26 13:54 ` Re: howto get a patch merged (WAS: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) Jos Poortvliet
2007-07-25 16:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25 16:40 ` [ck] " Michael Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707260839.51407.bhlope@mweb.co.za \
--to=bhlope@mweb.co.za \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=false.hopes@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox