From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:51:57 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [BUGFIX]{PATCH] flush icache on ia64 take2 Message-Id: <20070719235157.9715baff.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <469F71E7.4050200@bull.net> References: <20070706112901.16bb5f8a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070719155632.7dbfb110.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <469F5372.7010703@bull.net> <20070719220118.73f40346.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <469F71E7.4050200@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Zoltan Menyhart Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, tony.luck@intel.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mike@stroyan.net, dmosberger@gmail.com, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:15:03 +0200 Zoltan Menyhart wrote: > We may have, say 1 Gbyte / sec local i/o activity (using some RAIDs). > Assume a few % of this 1 Gbyte is the program execution, or program swap in. > It gives some hundreds of new exec pages / sec => > some msec-s can be lost each sec. > > I can agree that it should not be a big deal :-) > Hmm...but the current code flushes the page. just do it in "lazy" way. much difference ? -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org