From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:52:07 -0700 From: Bill Irwin Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs read() support Message-ID: <20070719175207.GH26380@holomorphy.com> References: <1184376214.15968.9.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20070718221950.35bbdb76.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184860309.18188.90.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20070719095850.6e09b0e8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070719170759.GE2083@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070719170759.GE2083@us.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Andrew Morton , Badari Pulavarty , Bill Irwin , lkml , linux-mm , Nick Piggin List-ID: On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:59AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > But I do think a second reason to do this is to make hugetlbfs behave > like a normal fs -- that is read(), write(), etc. work on files in the > mountpoint. But that is simply my opinion. Mine as well. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org