From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:31:32 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not limit locked memory when RLIMIT_MEMLOCK is RLIM_INFINITY Message-Id: <20070713103132.38e782e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <46979C4E.6000205@oracle.com> References: <4692D9E0.1000308@oracle.com> <20070713004408.b7162501.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46979C4E.6000205@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Herbert van den Bergh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave McCracken , Chris Mason List-ID: On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:37:50 -0700 Herbert van den Bergh wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > OK. Seems like a nasty bug if one happens to want to do that. Should we > > backport this into 2.6.22.x? > > > > Yes, please. Do you need me to do anything for that? > Nope. I stick a "Cc: " into the changelog and then magic happens: the -stable maintainers get a copy of the patch when it goes to Linus, they get notification when I drop it after Linus merged it and then they (hopeully) take the patch from Linus's tree. (But the last step is a bit of a hassle - I suspect they take my emailed version instead, but it would be super-rare for that to differ from the version which Linus merged) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org