From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: kxr@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/12] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:07:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711170736.f6c304d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711182251.433134748@sgi.com>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:22:26 -0700
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> Simply switch all for_each_online_node to for_each_memory_node. That way
> SLUB only operates on nodes with memory. Any allocation attempt on a
> memoryless node will fall whereupon SLUB will fetch memory from a nearby
> node (depending on how memory policies and cpuset describe fallback).
>
This is as far as I got when a reject storm hit.
> - for_each_online_node(node)
> + for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY)
> __kmem_cache_shrink(s, get_node(s, node), scratch);
I can find no sign of any __kmem_cache_shrink's anywhere.
Let's park all this until post-merge-window please. Generally, now is not
a good time for me to be merging 2.6.24 stuff.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-12 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070711182219.234782227@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20070711182252.138829364@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 18:46 ` [patch 10/12] Memoryless nodes: Update memory policy and page migration Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-11 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20070711182252.376540447@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 19:04 ` [patch 11/12] Add N_CPU node state Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20070711182250.005856256@sgi.com>
2007-07-11 19:06 ` [patch 01/12] NUMA: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes Christoph Lameter
2007-07-11 19:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-20 20:49 ` [PATCH] Memoryless nodes: use "node_memory_map" for cpuset mems_allowed validation Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-20 22:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 19:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 19:23 ` Paul Jackson
2007-07-23 20:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-23 20:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-23 21:48 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 14:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 16:16 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 14:15 ` [PATCH take2] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 16:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 19:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:50 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-24 20:30 ` [PATCH take3] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-25 22:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-26 13:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 0:40 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-27 14:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-24 20:35 ` [PATCH/RFC] Memoryless nodes: Suppress redundant "node with no memory" messages Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 15:56 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
[not found] ` <20070711182251.433134748@sgi.com>
2007-07-12 0:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-07-12 1:42 ` [patch 07/12] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support Christoph Lameter
2007-07-12 18:33 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-12 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 15:14 ` [patch 00/12] NUMA: Memoryless node support V3 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-13 16:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 16:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-07-13 17:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 19:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 20:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-13 21:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-13 23:18 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
[not found] ` <1185310277.5649.90.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707241402010.4773@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1185372692.5604.22.camel@localhost>
2007-07-25 15:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 19:16 ` 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: boot hang on ia64 with memoryless nodes Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 19:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 20:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 21:18 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 13:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 14:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-26 18:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 14:33 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711170736.f6c304d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kxr@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox