From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:44:25 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: zone movable patches comments Message-Id: <20070709204425.3dce0eee.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20070709110457.GB9305@skynet.ie> References: <4691E8D1.4030507@yahoo.com.au> <20070709110457.GB9305@skynet.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:04:57 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote: > It could but it was named this way for a reason. It was more important that > the administrator get the amount of memory for non-movable allocations > correct than movable allocations. If the size of ZONE_MOVABLE is wrong, > the hugepage pool may not be able to grow as large as desired. If the size > of memory usable of non-movable allocations is wrong, it's worse. > I'd like to vote for kernelcore= rather than movable_mem= :) Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org