From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/11] Shared Policy Overview Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:20:07 +0200 References: <20070625195224.21210.89898.sendpatchset@localhost> <1183123836.5037.25.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1183123836.5037.25.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706291620.07452.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Christoph Lameter , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, nacc@us.ibm.com List-ID: On Friday 29 June 2007 15:30:36 Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > Firstly, the "current situation" is deficient for applications that I, > on behalf of our customers, care about. So what's the specific use case from these applications? How much do they lose by not having this? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org