From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: clameter@sgi.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] NUMA: Memoryless Node support V1
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:48:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070619114805.a3ad8576.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070618191956.411091458@sgi.com>
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:19:56 -0700
clameter@sgi.com wrote:
> This patch is addressing various issues with NUMA as a result of memory
> less nodes being used. I think this is only a start fixing the most obvious
> things, there may be more where this came from. I'd appreciate if someone
> with a system with memoryless nodes could do systematic testing to see that
> all the NUMA functionality works properly. Nishanth has done some testing
> but he seems to be farily new to this.
>
> The patchset is also part of my upload queue at
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/2.6.22-rc4-mm2
>
> I know that some people are doing work based on this patchset. Will update
> the patches in that location if more fixes are submitted.
OK, I'll duck version 1 for now. Am hugely backlogged at present and I'm
mainly looking for simple-and-safe fixes.
Plus I'm generally going more slowly and deliberately in the vague hope
that others will follow suit.
> I hope Andrew
> will get a new mm version out soon.
umm, maybe, it depends on how much crap I merge today. I'll be spending
the rest of the week overseas, so I guess I'd better try.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-18 19:19 clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 01/10] Memoryless nodes: Fix GFP_THISNODE behavior clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 02/10] NUMA: Introduce node_memory_map clameter
2007-06-18 19:19 ` [patch 03/10] Fix MPOL_INTERLEAVE behavior for memoryless nodes clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 04/10] OOM: use the node_memory_map instead of constructing one on the fly clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 05/10] Memoryless Nodes: No need for kswapd clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 06/10] Memoryless Node: Slab support clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 07/10] Memoryless nodes: SLUB support clameter
2007-06-20 14:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-20 16:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-20 17:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 08/10] Uncached allocator: Handle memoryless nodes clameter
2007-06-19 6:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 09/10] Memoryless node: Allow profiling data to fall back to other nodes clameter
2007-06-18 19:20 ` [patch 10/10] Memoryless nodes: Update memory policy and page migration clameter
2007-06-19 18:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070619114805.a3ad8576.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox