Re: [PATCH] mm: More __meminit annotations.

[Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>]

> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:49:24PM +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > > -static inline unsigned long zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> > > +static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> > >  						unsigned long zone_type,
> > >  						unsigned long *zholes_size)
> > >  {
> > 
> > I thought __meminit is not effective for these static functions,
> > because they are inlined function. So, it depends on caller's 
> > defenition. Is it wrong? 
> > 
> Ah, that's possible, I hadn't considered that. It seems to be a bit more
> obvious what the intention is if it's annotated, especially as this is
> the convention that's used by the rest of mm/page_alloc.c. A bit more
> consistent, if nothing more.

I'm not sure which is intended. I found some functions define both
__init and inline in kernel tree. And probably, some functions don't
do it. So, it seems there is no convention.

I'm Okay if you prefer both defined. :-)


-- 
Yasunori Goto 


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>