From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CLp5Wk030502 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:51:05 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l5CLp3ft251486 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:51:04 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5CLp3YP024357 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:51:03 -0600 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:01 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Fix GFP_THISNODE behavior for memoryless nodes Message-ID: <20070612215101.GJ3798@us.ibm.com> References: <20070612204843.491072749@sgi.com> <20070612205738.548677035@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, Lee Schermerhorn List-ID: On 12.06.2007 [14:34:40 -0700], David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Rientjes wrote: > > > > > That's the point. Isn't !node_memory(nid) unlikely? > > > > Correct. > > > > Use unlikely > > > > Signed-off-cy: Christoph Lameter > > Acked-by: David Rientjes Yep, definitely makes sense. Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan -- Nishanth Aravamudan IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org