linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, hugh@veritas.com,
	lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa: mempolicy: dynamic interleave map for system init.
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:32:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070612153234.GI11115@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070612094359.GA5803@linux-sh.org>

On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:43:59PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:50:11AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > SLOB's big scalability problem at this point is number of CPUs.
> > Throwing some fine-grained locking at it or the like may be able to
> > help with that too.
> > 
> > Why would you even want to bother making it scale that large? For
> > starters, it's less affected by things like dcache fragmentation. The
> > majority of pages pinned by long-lived dcache entries will still be
> > available to other allocations.
> > 
> > Haven't given any thought to NUMA yet though..
> > 
> This is what I've hacked together and tested with my small nodes. It's
> not terribly intelligent, and it pushes off most of the logic to the page
> allocator. Obviously it's not terribly scalable, and I haven't tested it
> with page migration, either. Still, it works for me with my simple tmpfs
> + mpol policy tests.
> 
> Tested on a UP + SPARSEMEM (static, not extreme) + NUMA (2 nodes) + SLOB
> configuration.
> 
> Flame away!

For starters, it's not against the current SLOB, which no longer has
the bigblock list.

> -void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> +static void *__kmalloc_alloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)

That's a ridiculous name. So, uh.. more underbars!

Though really, I think you can just name it __kmalloc_node?

> +		if (node == -1)
> +			pages = alloc_pages(flags, get_order(c->size));
> +		else
> +			pages = alloc_pages_node(node, flags,
> +						get_order(c->size));

This fragment appears a few times. Looks like it ought to get its own
function. And that function can reduce to a trivial inline in the
!NUMA case.

> +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *c, gfp_t flags, int node)
> +{
> +	return __kmem_cache_alloc(c, flags, node);
> +}

If we make the underlying functions all take a node, this stuff all
gets simpler.

>  static void slob_timer_cbk(void)

This is gone in the latest SLOB too.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-12 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-07  1:17 Paul Mundt
2007-06-08  1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-08  2:47   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08  3:01     ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-08  3:11       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08  3:25     ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-08  3:49       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08  4:13         ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-08  4:27           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08  6:05             ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-08  6:09               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08  6:27                 ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-08  6:43                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 14:50       ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-12  2:36         ` Nick Piggin
2007-06-12  9:43         ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-12 15:32           ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-06-13  2:10             ` Nick Piggin
2007-06-13  3:12               ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-13  2:53             ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-13  3:16               ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070612153234.GI11115@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox