From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:53:24 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [PATCH v6][RFC] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes Message-ID: <20070612035324.GB11781@holomorphy.com> References: <20070611221036.GA14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611225213.GB14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611230829.GC14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611231008.GD14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612001542.GJ14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612034407.GB11773@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Initially filling the pool doesn't need the static affair. Refilling >> the pool from the page allocator can refill the node with the least >> memory first, and choose randomly otherwise. Using default mpolicies >> or defaulting to node-local memory instead of round-robin allocation >> will likely do for callers into the allocator. On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:50:49PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Each task already has a next node field. Just use that. That's new. It sounds convenient. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org