From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:40:03 -0600 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: variable length argument support Message-ID: <20070606144003.GD9722@colo.lackof.org> References: <20070605150523.786600000@chello.nl> <20070605151203.790585000@chello.nl> <20070606013658.20bcbe2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1181120061.7348.177.camel@twins> <20070606020651.19a89dca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1181121129.7348.181.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1181121129.7348.181.camel@twins> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ollie Wild , Ingo Molnar , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:12:09AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: ... > > I think the same problem will happen on NOMMU && STACK_GROWS_UP. There are > > several new references to bprm->vma in there, not all inside CONFIG_MMU. > > Right, which archs have that combo? I'll go gather cross compilers. parisc only supports with MMU. I don't know who elses uses STACK_GROWS_UP. hth, grant > > Perhaps I'd better create a flush_arg_page() function and stick that in > the mmu/nommu section somewhere earlier on in that file. Patch in a few. > > A related question; does anybody know of a no-MMU arch that uses > fs/compat.c ? If there is such a beast, that would need some work. > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org