From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4PLAAk0018860 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 17:10:10 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l4PLAAZu244252 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 15:10:10 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l4PLAAJ3001166 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 15:10:10 -0600 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:10:09 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: numafy several functions Message-ID: <20070525211009.GE31717@us.ibm.com> References: <20070516233053.GN20535@us.ibm.com> <20070516233155.GO20535@us.ibm.com> <20070523175142.GB9301@us.ibm.com> <1179947768.5537.37.camel@localhost> <20070523192951.GE9301@us.ibm.com> <20070525194318.GD31717@us.ibm.com> <1180126559.5730.73.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1180126559.5730.73.camel@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, anton@samba.org, clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, agl@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On 25.05.2007 [16:55:59 -0400], Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 12:43 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > > > > > > Yeah, if folks like the interface and are satisfied with it working, > > > I'll rebase onto -mm for Andrew's sanity. > > > > Would you like me to rebase onto 2.6.22-rc2-mm1? I think this is a very > > useful feature for NUMA systems that may have an unequal distribution of > > memory and don't like the hugepage allocations provided by the global > > sysctl. > > > > If I recall right, the collisions with Lee's hugetlb.c changes were > > pretty small, so it shouldn't be any trouble at all. > > Nish: > > Unless I missed your post, I think Andrew is waiting to hear from you > on the results of your testing of the 22-rc2 based v4 patch before > merging the huge page allocation fix. Err, right. Preliminary results: x86 2-node success x86_64 4-node success ppc64 4-node fails with mainline, still investigating x86 1-node fails with mainline, believe it is machine setup error, trying with another one Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org