From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] limit print_fatal_signal() rate Message-ID: <20070524095837.GA15689@elte.hu> References: <464ED258.2010903@users.sourceforge.net> <20070520203123.5cde3224.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070524075835.GC21138@elte.hu> <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Righi Cc: Andrew Morton , Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: * Andrea Righi wrote: > Actually it seems that SIGKILLs are not printed. In > get_signal_to_deliver() we have: > > [snip] > @@ -1843,6 +1879,8 @@ relock: > * Anything else is fatal, maybe with a core dump. > */ > current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED; > + if ((signr != SIGKILL) && print_fatal_signals) > + print_fatal_signal(regs, signr); yeah. Either i implemented that and forgot, or someone else implemented it. :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org