From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 03:08:23 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?! Message-ID: <20070522010823.GC27743@wotan.suse.de> References: <20070518040854.GA15654@wotan.suse.de> <20070519012530.GB15569@wotan.suse.de> <20070519181501.GC19966@holomorphy.com> <20070520052229.GA9372@wotan.suse.de> <20070520084647.GF19966@holomorphy.com> <20070520092552.GA7318@wotan.suse.de> <20070521080813.GQ31925@holomorphy.com> <20070521092742.GA19642@wotan.suse.de> <20070521224316.GC11166@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070521224316.GC11166@waste.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matt Mackall Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Christoph Lameter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:43:16PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:27:42AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > ... yeah, something like that would bypass > > As long as we're throwing out crazy unpopular ideas, try this one: > > Divide struct page in two such that all the most commonly used > elements are in one piece that's nicely sized and the rest are in > another. Have two parallel arrays containing these pieces and accessor > functions around the unpopular bits. > > Whether a sensible divide between popular and unpopular bits isn't > clear to me. But hey, I said it was crazy. That would be unpopular with pagecache, because that uses pretty well all fields. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org