From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: signals logged / [RFC] log out-of-virtual-memory events Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:14:57 +0200 References: <464C9D82.60105@redhat.com> <20070520205500.GJ22452@vanheusden.com> In-Reply-To: <20070520205500.GJ22452@vanheusden.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705202314.57758.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Folkert van Heusden Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Stephen Hemminger , Eric Dumazet , Rik van Riel , righiandr@users.sourceforge.net, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > + switch(sig) { > + case SIGQUIT: > + case SIGILL: > + case SIGTRAP: > + case SIGABRT: > + case SIGBUS: > + case SIGFPE: > + case SIGSEGV: > + case SIGXCPU: > + case SIGXFSZ: > + case SIGSYS: > + case SIGSTKFLT: Unconditional? That's definitely a very bad idea. If anything only unhandled signals should be printed this way because some programs use them internally. But I think your list is far too long anyways. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org