From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:11:33 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair Message-Id: <20070518101133.800db8de.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1179482054.2925.52.camel@lappy> References: <20070514131904.440041502@chello.nl> <1179385718.27354.17.camel@twins> <20070517175327.GX11115@waste.org> <1179429499.2925.26.camel@lappy> <1179437209.2925.29.camel@lappy> <1179482054.2925.52.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: clameter@sgi.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, tgraf@suug.ch, davem@davemloft.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, phillips@google.com, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi List-ID: Peter wrote: > cpusets are ignored when in dire straights for an kernel alloc. No - most kernel allocations never ignore cpusets. The ones marked NOFAIL or ATOMIC can ignore cpusets in dire straights and the ones off interrupts lack an applicable cpuset context. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org