linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] optimise unlock_page
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:27:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070517062729.GA14350@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705161242520.3890@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:47:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 16 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > > The other option of moving the bit into ->mapping hopefully avoids all
> > > the issues, and would probably be a little faster again on the P4, at the
> > > expense of being a more intrusive (but it doesn't look too bad, at first
> > > glance)...
> > 
> > Hmm, I'm so happy with PG_swapcache in there, that I'm reluctant to
> > cede it to your PG_locked, though I can't deny your use should take
> > precedence.  Perhaps we could enforce 8-byte alignment of struct
> > address_space and struct anon_vma to make both bits available
> > (along with the anon bit).
> 
> We probably could. It should be easy enough to mark "struct address_space" 
> to be 8-byte aligned.

Yeah, it might be worthwhile, because I agree that PG_swapcache would
work nicely there too.


> > But I think you may not be appreciating how intrusive PG_locked
> > will be.  There are many references to page->mapping (often ->host)
> > throughout fs/ : when we keep anon/swap flags in page->mapping, we
> > know the filesystems will never see those bits set in their pages,
> > so no page_mapping-like conversion is needed; just a few places in
> > common code need to adapt.
> 
> You're right, it could be really painful. We'd have to rename the field, 
> and use some inline function to access it (which masks off the low bits).

Yeah, I realise that the change is intrusive in terms of lines touched,
but AFAIKS, it should not be much more complex than a search/replace...

As far as deprecating things goes... I don't think we have to wait too
long, its more for features, drivers, or more fundamental APIs isn't it?
If we just point out that one must use set_page_mapping/page_mapping
rather than page->mapping, it is trivial to fix any out of tree breakage.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070508113709.GA19294@wotan.suse.de>
2007-05-08 11:40 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 20:08   ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-08 21:30   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-08 22:41     ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 22:50       ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-09 19:33         ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-09 21:21           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-10  3:37           ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-10 19:14             ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-11  8:54               ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-11 13:15                 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-13  3:32                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-13  4:39                     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-13  6:52                       ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 17:54                         ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-16 18:18                           ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 19:28                             ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-16 19:47                               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-17  6:27                                 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-05-16 17:21                     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-16 17:38                       ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 12:13 ` David Howells
2007-05-08 22:35   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070517062729.GA14350@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox