From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:28:50 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2 Message-ID: <20070516232850.GO85884050@sgi.com> References: <20070318233008.GA32597093@melbourne.sgi.com> <18993.1179310769@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18993.1179310769@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Howells Cc: David Chinner , lkml , linux-mm , linux-fsdevel List-ID: On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:19:29AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > However, page_mkwrite() isn't told which bit of the page is going to be > written to. This means it has to ask prepare_write() to make sure the whole > page is filled in. In other words, offset and to must be equal (in AFS I set > them both to 0). The assumption is the page is already up to date and we are writing the whole page unless EOF lands inside the page. AFAICT, we can't get called with a page that is not uptodate and so page filling is not something we should be doing (or want to be doing) here. All we want to do is to be able to change the mapping from a read to a write mapping (e.g. a read mapping of a hole needs to be changed on write) and do the relevant space reservation/allocation and buffer mapping needed for this change. > However, if someone adds a syscall to punch holes in files, this may change... We already have them - ioctl(XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP) and madvise(MADV_REMOVE) - and another - fallocate(FA_DEALLOCATE) - is on it's way. Racing with truncates should already be handled by the truncate code (i.e. partial page truncation does the zero filling). /me makes note to implement ->truncate_range() in XFS for MADV_REMOVE. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org