From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neilb@suse.de,
dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, nikita@clusterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, yingchao.zhou@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] lib: percpu_count_sum_signed()
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:08:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070510101129.054108237@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070510100839.621199408@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: percpu_counter_sum.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2800 bytes --]
Provide an accurate version of percpu_counter_read.
Should we go and replace the current use of percpu_counter_sum()
with percpu_counter_sum_positive(), and call this new primitive
percpu_counter_sum() instead?
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
lib/percpu_counter.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h 2007-05-02 19:43:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu_counter.h 2007-05-04 09:42:47.000000000 +0200
@@ -41,7 +41,18 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_destro
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void __percpu_counter_mod(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s32 amount, s32 batch);
void __percpu_counter_mod64(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
-s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
+
+static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+{
+ s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
+ return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
+}
+
+static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_signed(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+{
+ return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
+}
static inline void percpu_counter_mod(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s32 amount)
{
@@ -130,6 +141,11 @@ static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(str
return percpu_counter_read_positive(fbc);
}
+static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_signed(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+{
+ return fbc->count;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static inline void percpu_counter_inc(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
Index: linux-2.6/lib/percpu_counter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c 2007-05-02 19:43:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/lib/percpu_counter.c 2007-05-04 09:38:36.000000000 +0200
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_mod64);
* Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
* but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
*/
-s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
s64 ret;
int cpu;
@@ -74,6 +74,6 @@ s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_cou
ret += *pcount;
}
spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
- return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
+ return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_sum);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_sum);
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 10:08 [PATCH 00/15] per device dirty throttling -v6 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 01/15] nfs: remove congestion_end() Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 02/15] lib: percpu_counter variable batch Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 03/15] lib: percpu_counter_mod64 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/15] lib: percpu_counter_set Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/15] mm: bdi init hooks Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/15] mtd: give mtdconcat devices their own backing_dev_info Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/15] mm: scalable bdi statistics counters Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/15] mm: count reclaimable pages per BDI Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/15] mm: count writeback " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 11/15] mm: expose BDI statistics in sysfs Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 12/15] mm: per device dirty threshold Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 13/15] debug: sysfs files for the current ratio/size/total Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 14/15] lib: abstract the floating proportion Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-10 10:08 ` [PATCH 15/15] mm: dirty balancing for tasks Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 4:48 ` [PATCH 00/15] per device dirty throttling -v6 Neil Brown
2007-05-15 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070510101129.054108237@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=yingchao.zhou@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox