From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stub MADV_FREE implementation
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:05:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070508160547.e1576146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463FF3D3.9060007@redhat.com>
On Mon, 07 May 2007 23:51:47 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> Until we have better performance numbers on the lazy reclaim path,
> we can just alias MADV_FREE to MADV_DONTNEED with this trivial
> patch.
>
> This way glibc can go ahead with the optimization on their side
> and we can figure out the kernel side later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Could someone please explain what is going on here?
And has Ulrich indicated that glibc would indeed go out ahead of
the kernel in this fashion?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 4:43 [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory Rik van Riel
2007-05-04 10:53 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-04 11:58 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-04 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-04 16:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-04 23:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-05 0:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-06 22:43 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-07 2:42 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07 4:56 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-07 4:53 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-07 16:51 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-08 6:12 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 14:59 ` Rik van Riel
2007-05-08 23:23 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 18:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-05-08 23:43 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-08 3:51 ` [PATCH] stub MADV_FREE implementation Rik van Riel
2007-05-08 23:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-09 17:15 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-09 16:38 ` [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory Hugh Dickins
2007-05-29 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070508160547.e1576146.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox