From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:43:00 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12 Message-ID: <20070505094300.GA9592@infradead.org> References: <20070504102651.923946304@chello.nl> <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Miller Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tgraf@suug.ch, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, phillips@google.com List-ID: On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:27:16PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:26:51 +0200 > > > There is a fundamental deadlock associated with paging; > > I know you'd really like people like myself to review this work, but a > set of 40 patches is just too much to try and digest at once > especially when I have other things going on. When I have lots of > other things already on my plate, when I see a huge patch set like > this I have to just say "delete" because I don't kid myself since > I know I'll never get to it. > > Sorry there's now way I can review this with my current workload. There also quite alot of only semi-related thing in there. It would be much better to only do the network stack and iscsi parts first and leave nfs out for a while. Especially as the former are definitively useful while I strongly doubt that for swap over nfs. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org