From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:22:23 -0500 From: Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes Message-ID: <20070503132223.GB13015@kryten> References: <20070503022107.GA13592@kryten> <200705031059.18590.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705031059.18590.ak@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, clameter@sgi.com, nish.aravamudan@gmail.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, apw@shadowen.org List-ID: Hi, > > Im guessing registering empty remote zones might make the SGI guys a bit > > unhappy, maybe we should just force the registration of empty local > > zones? Does anyone care? > > I care. Don't do that please. Empty nodes cause all kinds of problems. Could you be more specific? How else do we fix the problem I just identified? Anton -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org