From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [patch 11/44] fs: fix data-loss on error
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:23:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424013433.778077000@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070424012346.696840000@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: fs-dataloss-stop.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1340 bytes --]
New buffers against uptodate pages are simply be marked uptodate, while the
buffer_new bit remains set. This causes error-case code to zero out parts
of those buffers because it thinks they contain stale data: wrong, they
are actually uptodate so this is a data loss situation.
Fix this by actually clearning buffer_new and marking the buffer dirty. It
makes sense to always clear buffer_new before setting a buffer uptodate.
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
fs/buffer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1800,7 +1800,9 @@ static int __block_prepare_write(struct
unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev,
bh->b_blocknr);
if (PageUptodate(page)) {
+ clear_buffer_new(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
continue;
}
if (block_end > to || block_start < from) {
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070424012346.696840000@suse.de>
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 01/44] mm: revert KERNEL_DS buffered write optimisation Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 02/44] Revert 81b0c8713385ce1b1b9058e916edcf9561ad76d6 Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 03/44] Revert 6527c2bdf1f833cc18e8f42bd97973d583e4aa83 Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 04/44] mm: clean up buffered write code Nick Piggin, Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 05/44] mm: debug write deadlocks Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 06/44] mm: trim more holes Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 6:07 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 6:17 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 07/44] mm: buffered write cleanup Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 08/44] mm: write iovec cleanup Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 09/44] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 10/44] mm: buffered write iterator Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 12/44] fs: introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 6:59 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 7:23 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 7:49 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-24 10:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:23 ` [patch 13/44] mm: restore KERNEL_DS optimisations Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-24 11:03 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070424013433.778077000@suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox