From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:20:37 +0200 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: dio_get_page() lockdep complaints Message-ID: <20070419142035.GH11780@kernel.dk> References: <20070419073828.GB20928@kernel.dk> <20070419012540.bed394e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070419083407.GD20928@kernel.dk> <200704191643.38367.vs@namesys.com> <20070419124933.GE11780@kernel.dk> <20070419125236.GF11780@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roland Dreier Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 19 2007, Roland Dreier wrote: > Maybe you could add some hack really early on (say at the beginning of > the reiserfs mount code) that took instances of the locks in the > correct order, so you would get a lockdep trace of where the ordering > is violated when it first happens? See the test case mail I sent out. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org