From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic rwsems
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:25:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070413102518.GD31487@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070413100416.GC31487@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:04:16PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> OK, this patch is against 2.6.21-rc6 + Mathieu's atomic_long patches.
>
> Last time this came up I was asked to get some numbers, so here are
> some in the changelog, captured with a simple kernel module tester.
> I got motivated again because of the MySQL/glibc/mmap_sem issue.
>
> This patch converts all architectures to a generic rwsem implementation,
> which will compile down to the same code for i386, or powerpc, for
> example, and will allow some (eg. x86-64) to move away from spinlock
> based rwsems.
Oh, and it also converts powerpc and sparc64 to 64-bit counters, so
they can handle more than 32K tasks waiting (which was apparently a
real problem for SGI, and is probably a good thing).
But that reminds me:
> +/*
> + * the semaphore definition
> + */
> +struct rw_semaphore {
> + atomic_long_t count;
> + spinlock_t wait_lock;
> + struct list_head wait_list;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> +#endif
> +};
I think I should put wait_lock after wait_list, so as to get a better
packing on most 64-bit architectures.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-13 10:04 Nick Piggin
2007-04-13 10:25 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-04-13 10:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-13 11:20 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-13 11:44 ` David Howells
2007-04-13 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-13 12:09 ` David Howells
2007-04-13 12:43 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-13 13:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-13 13:31 ` David Howells
2007-04-13 14:03 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-13 14:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-13 14:49 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070413102518.GD31487@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox