From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:27:10 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [rfc] rename page_count for lockless pagecache Message-ID: <20070412232710.GB23523@wotan.suse.de> References: <20070412103151.5564.16127.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20070412103340.5564.23286.sendpatchset@linux.site> <1176397419.6893.126.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1176397419.6893.126.camel@twins> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Memory Management , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:03:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:46 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > In order to force an audit of page_count users (which I have already done > > for in-tree users), and to ensure people think about page_count correctly > > in future, I propose this (incomplete, RFC) patch to rename page_count. > > > > My compiler suggests you did a very terse job, but given that its an > RFC... :-) Yeah, just mm/, to see how it looks. I have no problem converting the whole tree (there isn't much left), but the question is whether out of tree drivers use it. I guess if they do use it, then they need to be checked anyway, so there isn't really a way we can provide interim compatibility. > > Anyway, I like it, but I'll leave it out for now. > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org