From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:50:38 -0700 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation Message-Id: <20070322205038.6009989f.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <46033311.1000101@yahoo.com.au> References: <20070322231559.GA22656@sgi.com> <46033311.1000101@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: cpw@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Nick also wrote: > The problem was that Paul didn't think it followed cpus_exclusive > correctly, and I don't think we ever got to the point of giving it > a rigourous definition. >>From Documentation/cpusets.txt: - A cpuset may be marked exclusive, which ensures that no other cpuset (except direct ancestors and descendents) may contain any overlapping CPUs or Memory Nodes. This seems like the same definition to me as you gave, and I just agreed to in my previous post a few minutes ago. It seems rigourous to me ;>. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org