From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:01:07 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] hugetlb: pagetable_operations API (V2) Message-ID: <20070321160107.GB5264@infradead.org> References: <20070319200502.17168.17175.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Adam Litke , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , William Lee Irwin III , Christoph Hellwig , Ken Chen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:55:54PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Adam Litke wrote: > > Andrew, given the favorable review of these patches the last time around, would > > you consider them for the -mm tree? Does anyone else have any objections? > > I quite fail to understand the enthusiasm for these patches. All they > do is make the already ugly interfaces to hugetlb more obscure than at > present, and open the door to even uglier stuff later. Don't you need > to wait for at least one other user of these interfaces to emerge, > to get a better idea of whether they're appropriate? *nod* -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org