From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:22:53 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2 Message-ID: <20070319122252.GA12029@infradead.org> References: <20070318233008.GA32597093@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070319092222.GA1720@infradead.org> <45FE61D3.90105@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45FE61D3.90105@yahoo.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Chinner , lkml , linux-mm , linux-fsdevel List-ID: On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:11:31PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > I've got the patches in -mm now. I hope they will get merged when the > the next window opens. > > I didn't submit the ->page_mkwrite conversion yet, because I didn't > have any callers to look at. It is is slightly less trivial than for > nopage and nopfn, so having David's block_page_mkwrite is helpful. Yes. I was just wondering whether it makes more sense to do this functionality directly ontop of ->fault instead of converting i over real soon. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org