From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
Ashif Harji <asharji@cs.uwaterloo.ca>,
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap.c: unconditionally call mark_page_accessed
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:01:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315200159.GC19625@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703151719380.32335@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:44:01PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:56:59AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > Ashif Harji wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch unconditionally calls mark_page_accessed to prevent pages,
> > > > especially for small files, from being evicted from the page cache
> > > > despite frequent access.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ashif Harji <asharji@beta.uwaterloo.ca>
>
> Yeah, yeah, I'm not a real mman, I don't have my own patch and
> website for this ;) but I'm old, let me mumble some history...
>
> Ashif's patch would take us back to 2.4.10 when mark_page_accessed
> was introduced: in 2.4.11 someone (probably Andrea) immediately
> added a !offset || !filp->f_reada condition on it there, which
> remains in 2.4 to this day. That _probably_ means that Ashif's
> patch is suboptimal, and that your !offset patch is good.
>
> f_reada went away in 2.5.8, and the !offset condition remained
> until 2.6.11, when Miquel (CC'ed) replaced it by today's prev_index
> condition. His changelog entry appended below. Since it's Miquel
> who removed the !offset condition, he should be consulted on its
> reintroduction.
Yeah I did go back and check up on that changelog, because I knew
we had a !offset check there at one stage, which is immune to this
problem (or at least can handle it a little better).
I suspect that Miquel was probably more interested in _increasing_
mark_page_accessed coverage with his new condition than restricting
it from the !offset cases.
Thanks for digging it up and posting here, though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-15 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703081612290.1080@cpu102.cs.uwaterloo.ca>
[not found] ` <20070312142012.GH30777@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <20070312143900.GB6016@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20070312151355.GB23532@duck.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703121247210.7679@cpu102.cs.uwaterloo.ca>
[not found] ` <20070312173500.GF23532@duck.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.64.0703131438580.8193@cpu102.cs.uwaterloo.ca>
[not found] ` <20070313185554.GA5105@duck.suse.cz>
2007-03-14 19:58 ` Ashif Harji
2007-03-14 20:55 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-03-14 21:33 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-03-14 22:08 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-03-15 1:36 ` Xiaoning Ding
2007-03-15 5:22 ` Ashif Harji
2007-03-15 12:46 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-03-15 12:50 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-15 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 21:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-03-15 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-03-15 15:00 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-15 17:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-15 18:35 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-16 3:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-16 4:09 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-16 14:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-03-15 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-15 12:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-15 15:06 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-15 15:56 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-15 16:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-15 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-15 17:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-03-15 20:01 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-03-15 22:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-03-15 23:15 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-03-15 23:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-03-15 19:55 ` Ashif Harji
2007-03-15 20:07 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-15 20:31 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070315200159.GC19625@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asharji@cs.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox