From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:20:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Lumpy Reclaim V5 Message-Id: <20070315192038.82933a2f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:22:45 +0000 Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Following this email are three patches which represent the > current state of the lumpy reclaim patches; collectively lumpy V5. So where do we stand with this now? Does it make anything get better? I (continue to) think that if this is to be truly useful, we need some way of using it from kswapd to keep a certain minimum number of order-1, order-2, etc pages in the freelists. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org