From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:52:41 +0100 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom fix: prevent oom from killing a process with children/sibling unkillable Message-ID: <20070315135241.GG8321@wotan.suse.de> References: <20070315134921.GD18033@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070315134921.GD18033@in.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ankita Garg Cc: Linux Memory Management , LKML , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:19:21PM +0530, Ankita Garg wrote: > > Looking at oom_kill.c, found that the intention to not kill the selected > process if any of its children/siblings has OOM_DISABLE set, is not being met. > > > Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg Acked-by: Nick Piggin > > Index: ankita/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c > =================================================================== > --- ankita.orig/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c 2007-02-20 12:04:32.000000000 +0530 > +++ ankita/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c 2007-03-15 12:44:50.000000000 +0530 > @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ > * Don't kill the process if any threads are set to OOM_DISABLE > */ > do_each_thread(g, q) { > - if (q->mm == mm && p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE) > + if (q->mm == mm && q->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE) > return 1; > } while_each_thread(g, q); > > > Regards, > -- > Ankita Garg (ankita@in.ibm.com) > Linux Technology Center > IBM India Systems & Technology Labs, > Bangalore, India -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org