From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:44:35 -0800 From: Mark Gross Subject: Re: [RFC} memory unplug patchset prep [0/16] Message-ID: <20070307194435.GA5158@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: mgross@linux.intel.com References: <20070306133223.5d610daf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070307112450.b7917dcc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@skynet.ie, clameter@engr.sgi.com, Andrew Morton List-ID: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:31:35PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > > Are you aiming to target both ia64 and x86_64 with this patchset or are > > > you focusing on ia64 exclusively at the moment? > > > > > Just because a machine, which I can use as much as I want, is ia64. > > I don't have x86_64 now. I'll add i386 in the next post. > > I think all arch which support MEMORY_HOTPLUG will support unplug at last. > > > > Ok, sounds good. I can offer quite extensive x86_64 testing coverage. I > think it's going to be much better to base this patchset on 2.6.21-rc2-mm2 > so we don't have a couple different GFP_MOVABLE implementations floating > around. > > I'll await your next patchset and then I'll play around with it for > x86_64. I'd like to eventually combine your memory unplug work with Mark > Gross's PM-memory enabling node flags (cc'd). We can wire it up through a > sysfs interface for userspace manipulation and see it working in action. > > Looking forward to the next series. Me too! --mgross -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org