From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [patch 8/6] mm: fix cpdfio vs fault race
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070307110429.GF5555@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
OK, this is how we can plug that hole, leveraging my
previous patches to lock page over do_no_page.
I'm pretty sure the PageLocked invariant is correct.
--
Fix msync data loss and (less importantly) dirty page accounting inaccuracies
due to the race remaining in clear_page_dirty_for_io().
The deleted comment explains what the race was, and the added comments
explain how it is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
@@ -1676,6 +1676,17 @@ gotten:
unlock:
pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
if (dirty_page) {
+ /*
+ * Yes, Virginia, this is actually required to prevent a race
+ * with clear_page_dirty_for_io() from clearing the page dirty
+ * bit after it clear all dirty ptes, but before a racing
+ * do_wp_page installs a dirty pte.
+ *
+ * do_fault is protected similarly by holding the page lock
+ * after the dirty pte is installed.
+ */
+ lock_page(dirty_page);
+ unlock_page(dirty_page);
set_page_dirty_balance(dirty_page);
put_page(dirty_page);
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -903,6 +903,8 @@ int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page
{
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
+ BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+
if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
/*
* Yes, Virginia, this is indeed insane.
@@ -928,14 +930,19 @@ int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page
* We basically use the page "master dirty bit"
* as a serialization point for all the different
* threads doing their things.
- *
- * FIXME! We still have a race here: if somebody
- * adds the page back to the page tables in
- * between the "page_mkclean()" and the "TestClearPageDirty()",
- * we might have it mapped without the dirty bit set.
*/
if (page_mkclean(page))
set_page_dirty(page);
+ /*
+ * We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
+ * installing a dirty pte and marking the page dirty
+ * at this point. We do this by having them hold the
+ * page lock at some point after installing their
+ * pte, but before marking the page dirty.
+ * Pages are always locked coming in here, so we get
+ * the desired exclusion. See mm/memory.c:do_wp_page()
+ * for more comments.
+ */
if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
return 1;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-07 11:04 Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-03-07 11:20 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-07 11:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-07 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-07 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 5:50 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-07 11:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-07 11:37 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070307110429.GF5555@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox