From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 2/2] mm: mlocked pages off LRU
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:40:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070305164005.GA10449@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070305161746.GD8128@wotan.suse.de>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:17:46PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@
> #include <linux/swapops.h>
> #include <linux/elf.h>
>
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> /* use the per-pgdat data instead for discontigmem - mbligh */
> unsigned long max_mapnr;
> @@ -855,6 +857,9 @@ unsigned long unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gath
>
> tlb_finish_mmu(*tlbp, tlb_start, start);
>
> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> + munlock_vma_pages_range(vma, start, end);
> +
> if (need_resched() ||
> (i_mmap_lock && need_lockbreak(i_mmap_lock))) {
> if (i_mmap_lock) {
Argh, I missed fixing this. It is only supposed to munlock if i_mmap_lock
is not set (because munlock requires taking the page lock).
Those paths which do take i_mmap_lock here (unmap_mapping...) already do
their own handling of mlocked.
There are probably other bugs in my patchset, but this was the obvious
one.
BTW. anything that invalidates pagecache breaks mlock I think (not with
my patch but in general). I'll have to fix this...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-05 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-05 16:17 Nick Piggin
2007-03-05 16:40 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-03-05 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-05 18:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-05 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-05 19:26 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-06 1:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 1:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-06 1:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 1:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-06 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 2:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-06 2:50 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 14:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 18:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-07 3:07 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 22:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-03-07 3:52 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-06 15:59 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070305164005.GA10449@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox