From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] mm: lockless pagecache lookups
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:18:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061207162734.840226000@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061207161800.426936000@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: mm-lockless-pagecache-lookups.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7831 bytes --]
Combine page_cache_get_speculative with lockless radix tree lookups to
introduce lockless page cache lookups (ie. no mapping->tree_lock on
the read-side).
The only atomicity changes this introduces is that the gang pagecache
lookup functions now behave as if they are implemented with multiple
find_get_page calls, rather than operating on a snapshot of the pages.
In practice, this atomicity guarantee is not used anyway, and it is
difficult to see how it could be. Gang pagecache lookups are designed
to replace individual lookups, so these semantics are natural.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
mm/filemap.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
mm/page-writeback.c | 8 +--
mm/readahead.c | 6 --
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-rt/mm/filemap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-rt.orig/mm/filemap.c 2006-11-29 14:20:48.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-rt/mm/filemap.c 2006-11-29 14:20:52.000000000 +0100
@@ -596,15 +596,31 @@ void fastcall __lock_page_nosync(struct
* Is there a pagecache struct page at the given (mapping, offset) tuple?
* If yes, increment its refcount and return it; if no, return NULL.
*/
-struct page * find_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long offset)
+struct page *find_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long offset)
{
+ void **pagep;
struct page *page;
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
- page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
- if (page)
- page_cache_get(page);
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+repeat:
+ page = NULL;
+ pagep = radix_tree_lookup_slot(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
+ if (pagep) {
+ page = radix_tree_deref_slot(pagep);
+ if (unlikely(!page || page == RADIX_TREE_RETRY))
+ goto repeat;
+
+ if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
+ goto repeat;
+
+ /* Has the page moved? */
+ if (unlikely(page != *pagep)) {
+ page_cache_release(page);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_get_page);
@@ -644,26 +660,19 @@ struct page *find_lock_page(struct addre
{
struct page *page;
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
repeat:
- page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
+ page = find_get_page(mapping, offset);
if (page) {
- page_cache_get(page);
- if (TestSetPageLocked(page)) {
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
- __lock_page(page);
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
-
- /* Has the page been truncated while we slept? */
- if (unlikely(page->mapping != mapping ||
- page->index != offset)) {
- unlock_page(page);
- page_cache_release(page);
- goto repeat;
- }
+ lock_page(page);
+ /* Has the page been truncated? */
+ if (unlikely(page->mapping != mapping
+ || page->index != offset)) {
+ unlock_page(page);
+ page_cache_release(page);
+ goto repeat;
}
}
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+
return page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_lock_page);
@@ -733,13 +742,39 @@ unsigned find_get_pages(struct address_s
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned int ret;
+ unsigned int nr_found;
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
- ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&mapping->page_tree,
- (void **)pages, start, nr_pages);
- for (i = 0; i < ret; i++)
- page_cache_get(pages[i]);
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+restart:
+ nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot(&mapping->page_tree,
+ (void ***)pages, start, nr_pages);
+ ret = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
+ struct page *page;
+repeat:
+ page = radix_tree_deref_slot((void **)pages[i]);
+ if (unlikely(!page))
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * this can only trigger if nr_found == 1, making livelock
+ * a non issue.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(page == RADIX_TREE_RETRY))
+ goto restart;
+
+ if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
+ goto repeat;
+
+ /* Has the page moved? */
+ if (unlikely(page != *((void **)pages[i]))) {
+ page_cache_release(page);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+
+ pages[ret] = page;
+ ret++;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -760,19 +795,44 @@ unsigned find_get_pages_contig(struct ad
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned int ret;
+ unsigned int nr_found;
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
- ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&mapping->page_tree,
- (void **)pages, index, nr_pages);
- for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
- if (pages[i]->mapping == NULL || pages[i]->index != index)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+restart:
+ nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot(&mapping->page_tree,
+ (void ***)pages, index, nr_pages);
+ ret = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
+ struct page *page;
+repeat:
+ page = radix_tree_deref_slot((void **)pages[i]);
+ if (unlikely(!page))
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * this can only trigger if nr_found == 1, making livelock
+ * a non issue.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(page == RADIX_TREE_RETRY))
+ goto restart;
+
+ if (page->mapping == NULL || page->index != index)
break;
- page_cache_get(pages[i]);
+ if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
+ goto repeat;
+
+ /* Has the page moved? */
+ if (unlikely(page != *((void **)pages[i]))) {
+ page_cache_release(page);
+ goto repeat;
+ }
+
+ pages[ret] = page;
+ ret++;
index++;
}
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
- return i;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -793,6 +853,7 @@ unsigned find_get_pages_tag(struct addre
unsigned int ret;
read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ /* TODO: implement lookup_tag_slot and make this lockless */
ret = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&mapping->page_tree,
(void **)pages, *index, nr_pages, tag);
for (i = 0; i < ret; i++)
Index: linux-2.6-rt/mm/readahead.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-rt.orig/mm/readahead.c 2006-11-29 14:20:36.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-rt/mm/readahead.c 2006-11-29 14:20:52.000000000 +0100
@@ -285,27 +285,25 @@ __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address
/*
* Preallocate as many pages as we will need.
*/
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < nr_to_read; page_idx++) {
pgoff_t page_offset = offset + page_idx;
if (page_offset > end_index)
break;
+ rcu_read_lock();
page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, page_offset);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (page)
continue;
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
page = page_cache_alloc_cold(mapping);
- read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
if (!page)
break;
page->index = page_offset;
list_add(&page->lru, &page_pool);
ret++;
}
- read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
/*
* Now start the IO. We ignore I/O errors - if the page is not
Index: linux-2.6-rt/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-rt.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2006-11-29 14:20:36.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-rt/mm/page-writeback.c 2006-11-29 14:20:52.000000000 +0100
@@ -956,17 +956,15 @@ int test_set_page_writeback(struct page
EXPORT_SYMBOL(test_set_page_writeback);
/*
- * Return true if any of the pages in the mapping are marged with the
+ * Return true if any of the pages in the mapping are marked with the
* passed tag.
*/
int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag)
{
- unsigned long flags;
int ret;
-
- read_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_lock();
ret = radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, tag);
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mapping_tagged);
--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-07 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 16:18 [PATCH 00/16] concurrent pagecache (against 2.6.19-rt) Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 01/16] radix-tree: RCU lockless readside Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 02/16] radix-tree: use indirect bit Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 03/16] radix-tree: gang_lookup_slot Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 04/16] radix-tree: gang_lookup_tag_slot Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 05/16] mm: speculative get page Nick Piggin
2006-12-07 16:18 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 07/16] mm: fix speculative page get preemption bug Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 08/16] mm: speculative page get for PREEMPT_RT Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 09/16] mm: speculative find_get_pages_tag Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 10/16] mm: remove find_tylock_page Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 11/16] mm: change tree_lock into a spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 12/16] radix-tree: concurrent write side support Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 13/16] atomic_ulong_t Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 14/16] mm/fs: abstract address_space::nrpages Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 15/16] mm: lock_page_ref Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-07 16:18 ` [PATCH 16/16] mm: concurrent pagecache write side Peter Zijlstra
2006-12-11 19:03 ` [PATCH 00/16] concurrent pagecache (against 2.6.19-rt) Christoph Lameter
2006-12-11 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061207162734.840226000@chello.nl \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox