From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:29:20 -0600 From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: build error: sparsemem + SLOB Message-ID: <20061121192920.GO4797@waste.org> References: <20061120183632.GD4797@waste.org> <20061121143253.51B5.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20061121191410.GL4797@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Yasunori Goto , Hugh Dickins , Randy Dunlap , linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg List-ID: On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:32:57AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > Are there any implications for preemptible kernels here? > > Matt: Would you mind if I replace SLOB with my new slab design? It is as > memory efficient as yours (maybe even more since we do not have the > header for each allocation). It can work efficiently in an SMP system > (NUMA still under test). The code is more complex though. > Still needs to mature. How's the code size compare? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org